According to IPCC, the world is getting warmer and this is due to human emissions of carbon dioxide. Dear reader, I have to admit that also I once believed in the IPCC dogma, until I started to independently investigate the science. I soon discovered that the AGW theory (ie hypothesis) can easily be disproved by a number of indisputable scientific facts supported by thousands of scientific articles, blog entries and youtube videos which for obvious (nudge nudge) reasons didn’t make it into the IPCC propaganda reports. Learn these facts verbatim, and you will emerge victorious from every debate with the warmist scum!
- Temperatures have never increased – global warming stopped in 1998.
- We cannot accurately measure temperature. A single thermometer has an error of plus/minus several degrees Kevin, and if you use a thousand thermometers, the error is magnified to plus/minus several thousands degrees Kevin (law of large numbers).
- The level of carbon dioxide has not increased.
- We cannot measure carbon dioxide in the air with any meaningful accuracy – the atoms are transparent, and the amounts are too small (parts of billions).
- Carbon dioxide is an insignificant trace gas.
- Human emissions of carbon dioxide are dwarfed by the emissions of nature, in particular from volcanoes and fish.
- There is no way emissions of carbon dioxide can change the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. That level is determined by other factors, such as temperature.
- There is no correlations whatsoever between temperature and carbon dioxide.
- Correlation is not causation.
- There are thousands of natural factors that control the climate much more than any human activities and we know very little about these factors. The uncertainty is gargantuan!
- There is no proven physical theory that supports the notion that carbon dioxide can cause warming.
- AGW theory is based on quantum mechanics, which was disproved by Einstein: God does not play dice (alea iacta est).
- If carbon dioxide hypothetically would have any effect on temperature, it would have been saturated by now.
- The greenhouse effect violates the second law of thermodynamics.
- The greenhouse effect is a misnomer – there is nothing like the glass panels of a greenhouse.
- It was much warmer during previous historical periods when there was no carbon dioxide. For instance, it was several degrees warmer during the medieval warm period (MWP) when Greenland was green and covered by grape vines.
- The computer models which are the only support for the AGW hypothesis are nothing more than glorified computer games, which only do what you program them to do. Garbage in, garbage out as any programmer can testify!
- Computer models of the climate do not take into account clouds, water vapour, the oceans, geothermal energy, the sun and that Earth is spherical. Therefore, they are completely unrealistic.
- AGW theory cannot explain the medieval warming period, the little ice age, the big ice age, the Roman warming period, the Minoan warming period, the ice on the Themes and the extinction of the dinosaurs.
- AGW theory is not falsifiable, and hence not a scientific theory according to Popper!
Cognito ergo sum!
O tempora o mores!
ReplyDeletePoint 18: is the earth spherical or spherioidal?
ReplyDeleteThe precise shape of the Earth is a matter of scientific controversy. Obviously, we cannot believe what NASA claims.
ReplyDeleteYou forgot that CO2 is food for plants! More CO2 means trees grow faster - just like more calories make Americans grow fatter...er...I mean faster!! And so much healthier for it. We have the healthiest people on earth and the best health care system to BTW.
ReplyDeleteWhy did the GOP blow the BP oil rig? Why do the Clintons promote wind power when the wind is at fault for many things? How can Rush Limbaugh take so many drugs? How can we trust math when we know it was invented by Arabs? How can we trust Pelosi and Palin when we know they are in a woman's lib cabal against our Constitution? Why is it that Newt Gingrich is pushing crystal meth in West Virginia. Trust no one. Watch your six.
ReplyDeleteMy favorites off of this list are:
ReplyDelete3. The level of carbon dioxide has not increased.
4. We cannot measure carbon dioxide in the air with any meaningful accuracy – the atoms are transparent, and the amounts are too small (parts of billions).
How can you say you that carbon dioxide has not increased or decrease if you cannot measure it.
#ConservativeContradiction
I really agree with all of your AGW rebuttals. But my favourite is that there is no correlation between CO2 and temperature. It stops those alarmists in their tracks every time. I usually add that the burden of proof is on the scientists to show that CO2 has any effect at all. That'll stall 'em!
ReplyDeleteLonny "The Libertarian" Eachus:)
Beg to differ, most esteemed Herr Baron von Blogosphere und gewarmingnonsense!
ReplyDeleteYour item nummer zwanzig, "AGW theory is not falsifiable, and hence not a scientific theory according to Popper!" is patently false. AGW is falsified by the mere existence of WhatsUPdoc and other such sources of enlightenment. Even if they were to mysteriously be silenced by some gewarmingist plot, their electronic record speaks for itself.
Oy vey, does it ever.