data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a94f9/a94f9e4d6ef0decefaf1ef621c546467eb7cb865" alt=""
Hope you enjoyed the funny title of today's post. It is about the disgraceful
Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project which now has announced its very uninteresting and non-peer-reviewed results. All it proves is that one can manipulate temperature data so that Earth seems to be warming. But we already knew that, didn't we?
I always suspected these "sceintists" from Berkaley were only fake sceptics. Now it turns out its all a big scam aimed at gullible people, to let them believe that oh yes, the world is really warming, we didn't believe it ourselves but look, we come up with the same hockeystick as Michael Man (how many months does it take to copy a hockystick, would you think, but of course those former hippies from Burkely need to justify the many millions this must have cost the American tax payer). What's next? Sometimes in my dark days, Baron, I think that even you must be a fake sceptic making fun of us, the climate realists... But of course, that can't be! But personally I don't trust this Wats fellow at all, he's buying too much into this "the world is warming" story if you ask me. The first line of defence should always be that no, it's not, it's cooling, and we know that is true. Do you think he (Wat's) would accept the reality of a Flat Earth?
ReplyDeleteWhich brings me on the important topic: how can we discriminate the fake sceptics from the real ones? I was thinking, baron, we need some sort of an initiation ritual. We could ask anyone who claims to be a "global" "warming" sceptic to piss on a photo of their Leader, Al-gore. But then I realised some of those "sceintists" may be homosexuals with a fetish for golden showers who may actually enjoy pissing on a picture of their guru, so this method may not be 100% waterproof.
ReplyDeleteBEST tried to integrate the Urban Heat Island effect with other temperature data. But they didn't account for the Rural, Wilderness and Oceanic Heat Island effects. There is even a "theory" (there's that word again) that there is an Island Heat Island effect. All 4 effects balance out. It's simply that any attempt to place a permanent weather station anywhere means roads and concrete and metal and black-roofed air-conditioned buildings etc. nearby, raising the temperature around the thermometer. More weather stations mean more hot thermometers, leading to higher temp readings. Meanwhile, the unthermometered world is cooling.
ReplyDeleteThe proof? Nauscopy, developed by Étienne Bottineau in the 1780s. He was able to detect ships far away at sea even before they appeared above the horizon. His method remains a secret, but probably had to do with atmospheric heat ripples coming off ships. Even thermometers on ships LIE like RUGS! Google it! Amateur scientists - the only reliable kind - blog about it!
Like it or not, climate is far too complex and difficult to do research on, so any attempt to collect and analyze data is doomed to failure. At least we skeptics don't bother to try. That's our greatest gift to humanity. That, and blogs.
"I'll give you my thermometer when you pry it from my cold, dead hands." Winston Smith, as quoted in George Orson Welles' book "1984".
New York smartass "funnyman" Jon Stewart commented on his "show" the other day that compared to the days after days of rolling news coverage in the wake of the Climategate scandal, the news of the BEST results garnered about 24 seconds worth.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure what point he was trying to make, except perhaps 24 seconds was too long for Mewler's warmist garbage.
If the planet is warmin' howcome I have a cold?
ReplyDeleteI don't think any sceintist can explain that 'cause there ain't no such thing as sceince! Its all a homoliberulcommiethreelegged lesbianosamabinalgoreist hoax perpetrates by Satan worshipping Goddam heathens!!!!!!!Michael Jackson knew the truth and they had him assasssinated!
Fuelled with righteous rage I went to be BEST (who are they trying to fool?) website to begin submitting my FOI requests for the station data and who cuts their hair.
ReplyDeleteAnd the bastards, The BASTARDS have already put the station data on their website. This just shows how underhanded these thugs are!
These BESTards! Don't they know that global warming is caused by something called the sun? Or that global warming is caused by something called cosmic rays? Or that anyone with a different theory of global warming, from the so called scientific consensus, is either hounded out of work and forced to wear women's lingerie in public while kissing a pregnant goat!!!! How can these people stifle science so, by sticking to the facts?
ReplyDeleteNigel Cauldron wrote:
ReplyDelete"...forced to wear women's lingerie in public while kissing a pregnant goat!!"
The Bastards! I thought we were alone, and I demand a paternity test!