Thursday, 27 May 2010

The Dunning-Kruger effect and the climate scum

Some of you may have heard about the Dunning-Kruger effect. Dunning-Kruger was a psychologist who discovered that "people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it." I will restate that in plain language so you dear reader can understand it: morons tend to believe that they are right.

The Dunning-Kruger effect can be observed on a massive scale in the climate debate. The warmists are so sure they are right, but they are wrong. This is an undisputable expression for the Dunning-Kruger effect (and for their hatred for mankind). We humble skeptics, on the other hand, claim that we don’t know anything about how the climate works, and that it is hubris to think that our diminutive emissions of a trace gas can control the climate. We are competent and our metacognitive abilities are excellent.

Al’Gore, the climate terrorist, believes he knows everything about the climate. He has even made a movie about it, called An Inconvenient Truth. The movie was so riddled with lies that he got sentenced to prison in England (see photographic evidence above). Unfortunately, he managed to escape, probably by bribing the prison guards with his “carbon tax” billions. But does in really make sense to believe more in the slick politician Al’Gore than in the founder of the Weather Channel, distinguished TV meteorologist John Coleman? This is what the experienced weather expert John Coleman has to say:

"Does carbon dioxide cause a warming of the atmosphere? The proponents of global warming pin their whole piece on that, The compound carbon dioxide makes up only 38 out of every 100,000 particles in the atmosphere. That's about twice as what there were in the atmosphere in the time we started burning fossil fuels, so it's gone up, but it's still a tiny compound. So how can that tiny trace compound have such a significant effect on temperature? My position is it can't. It doesn't, and the whole case for global warming is based on a fallacy."

I couldn’t have said it any better myself. But does Al’Gore listen to Colemann? No, Al’Gore continues to believe in his own global warming fraud instead. Al’Gore is a veritable poster boy for the Dunning-Kruger effect. And he thinks he won the American election 2000 as well. His incompetence robs him of the metacognitive ability to understand he is wrong! We’ll see what the court says when Colemann and 30,000 other top scientists sue Al’Gore! Then he'll go to prison again!

The so-called “climate scientists” in their ivory towers, playing with their computer games … sorry models, are also convinced they are right. I’m talking about Mann and Hansen and Jones and the rest of the CRU cabal. What do they know about the lives of real people? What do they know about real climates? Not a jota. Trust me, not a jota. The average Joe Sixpack, who is out there in the sun or the rain or the snow everyday, carrying my golf clubs, knows a hundred times more about the climate than the scientists in their ivory lab coats do! Still the latter want to control every aspect of our lives. They are truly Dunning-Kruger sufferers, and the rest of us will also suffer in the most gruesome manners if we listen to them!
So the next time somebody tells you that we all have to stop living in order to prevent Earth from warming, you can respond: "You only say that because of the Dunning-Kruger effect! You are wrong but your incompetence robs you of the metacognitive ability to realize it!" And if you find it hard to remember that sentence, then you can write it down on a piece of paper.
Aliquando et insanire jucundum est!

Saturday, 22 May 2010

Climate-gate or Climate-loo


I have been applying my considerable intellectual gifts to the question about the best names for the almost infinite series of scandals of Al Gore and his ICCCP lackeys. The use of the suffix "-gate" has become very popular - it is a reference to the Watergate scandal in USA a couple of years ago. Thus we have Climate-gate, Himalayas-gate, Dutch-gate, Holland-gate, Netherlands-gate, Duck-gate and so on.

While "gate" most certaintly works well for an American audience, it is less optimal for other countries. After all, Watergate was an internal US affair. In addition, it was just a matter of somebody breaking into an office and discovering a scandal in some letters. It does not at all make justice to the magnitude of the global warming scam: a world-wide all-encompassing plot to enslave and dominate every country and every human being on the face of planet Earth.

I want to propose to base the names of these scandals on another and truly momentous event: the defeat of the French Communist Emperor Napoleon at the battle of Waterloo (see picture above)! Let me explain as clearly as possible. Watergate gave us Climate-gate. Following the same pattern, Waterloo gives us Climate-loo. And for some of the other scandals: Himalayas-loo, Dutch-loo, Holland-loo, Netherlands-loo, Duck-loo and so on for an endless sequence of loos!

Such names will surely make people aware of the great significance and seriousness of these events!

Atqui, e lotio est.

Friday, 21 May 2010

Gates galore



Numerous like sand in the desert are the different scandals that have been shaking the global warming establishment the past year. A very clever person came up with attaching the suffix "-gate" to each one of these outrageousities, in rembemberance of the Watergate scandal when Nixon (famous for his enviromentalist inclinations) broke into the Republican headquarters.

The current avalanche of gates started with Climate-gate, and then it went on from there, like a card-house falling apart when you torch it with napalm. Woossh! For your benefit, I have compiled the most comprehensive list of Climate gates on the Internet. It includes past, present and future gates.
Remember that one single gate was enough to end the presidency of Nixon. Then imagine the unstoppable force of the more than 150 gates (including sub-gates) I have listed here. I even add more of them as I write this. Anybody who sees this list must think: "Oh boy, how may gates! Global warming cannot be true!" If enough people read this list, we will win the war against climate science! Then we will be the consensus! It is simple blog science logic.
Hannibal ante portas!

  1. Africa-gate


  2. Alaska-gate


  3. An Inconventient Truth-gate


  4. Amazon-gate


  5. America-gate


  6. Antarctic-fortress-gate


  7. Antarctic sea-gate


  8. Asia-gate


  9. Asphalt-gate


  10. Australia-gate


  11. Bangladesh-gate


  12. Barbecue-gate


  13. Bedwetting-gate


  14. Big butt Gore-gate


  15. Bondage-gate


  16. Boot-cleaning manual-gate


  17. Bill-gates (Ha ha ha, this is only a joke. And a precaution.)


  18. Blubber-gate


  19. Bull-gate


  20. Censorship-gate


  21. Centaur-gate


  22. China-gate


  23. Chicken-gate


  24. Climate Camp-gate


  25. Climate-gate, with sub-gates:

    1. Trick-gate

    2. Hide the decline-gate

    3. Travesty-gate

    4. Harry-gate

    5. Harry's brother-gate

    6. Harry's sister-gate

    7. Harry's wife-gate

    8. Harry's wife's lover-gate

    9. Fudge-gate

    10. Chocolate-gate

    11. Beer-gate

    12. Evil idol-gate

    13. Missing emails-gate

    14. Smoke-gate



  26. Cow-gate


  27. Crack cocaine for paleoclimatologists-gate


  28. CRU data deletion-gate


  29. CRU human sacrifice-gate


  30. Crumbs in the bed-gate


  31. Death star defense-gate


  32. Dinosaur-gate


  33. Dirty underwear-gate


  34. Dog-ate it-gate


  35. Dog peed on carpet-gate


  36. Discernable influence-gate


  37. Drought-gate


  38. Duck-gate


  39. Dutch-gate


  40. Europe-gate


  41. Fat Gore-gate


  42. Five-star WWF-gate


  43. Finland-gate


  44. Flooded house-gate


  45. FOI-gate


  46. Football-gate


  47. Fraud-gate


  48. Fungus-gate


  49. Gatekeeping-gate


  50. GISS Metar-gate


  51. Gol-gate


  52. Gore refuses to debate Monckton-gate


  53. Gore is fat-gate


  54. Gore private jet-gate


  55. Gore weighs a lot-gate


  56. Godzilla-gate


  57. Golden gate-gate


  58. Golf club-gate


  59. Greenpeace-gate


  60. Greens too yellow to admit they are red-gate


  61. Hamster-gate


  62. Hansen 1930s hot-gate and 1988 hearings


  63. Herring-gate


  64. Himalayas-gate


  65. Hitler Jugend(jewish)-gate


  66. Hockey-stick-gate


  67. Hole in my bucket-gate


  68. Holland-gate


  69. Holy cow-gate


  70. Horror fish-gate


  71. Horse-head-gate


  72. Hurricane-gate


  73. ICCCP mind control-gate


  74. ICCCP and M Jackson-gate


  75. Ice-gate


  76. Iceland-gate


  77. Islam-gate


  78. Janet Jackson Super Bowl-gate


  79. Jesus Paper-gate


  80. Kitten-gate


  81. Lizard-gate


  82. Kilimanjaro-gate


  83. Lost sock-gate


  84. Malaria-gate


  85. Manchurian candy-gate


  86. McIntyre is not treated with enough respect-gate


  87. Mega-mansion-gate


  88. Media-gate


  89. Met Office computer-gate


  90. Minotaur-gate


  91. Netherlands-gate


  92. Nosepicking-gate


  93. NASA/NCDC bad data-gate


  94. NASA fake email leak-gate


  95. NASA intentionally crash their own satellite-gate


  96. NASA booze and hookers-gate


  97. News-gate


  98. New Zealand-gate


  99. NOAA adjustment-gate


  100. NOAA/GISS data selection-gate


  101. NOAA/GISS do something with their data-gate


  102. NYT alarmism-gate


  103. Obesity-gate


  104. Outrageous-gate


  105. Overpeck-gate


  106. Oxbourgh-gate


  107. Pacman-gate


  108. Pachauri-gate


  109. Peer-review-gate 1


  110. Peer-review-gate 2


  111. Pig-gate


  112. Pokemon-gate


  113. Polar bear-gate


  114. Porn(hard)-gate


  115. Porn(soft)-gate


  116. Press-gate


  117. Prison-gate


  118. Propaganda-gate


  119. Rahmstorf-gate


  120. Reef-gate


  121. Reptilians from space-gate


  122. Revelle-gate


  123. Russia-gate


  124. Satanistic rites in ICCCP compound-gate


  125. Scam-gate


  126. Scandal in Bohemia-gate


  127. Sinatra-gate


  128. Solar-gate


  129. Soviet-gate


  130. Spears-gate


  131. Stationery-gate


  132. Stasi-gate


  133. Stern-gate


  134. Sting-gate


  135. Stop reading this now-gate


  136. Student dissertation-gate


  137. Surface stations-gate


  138. Teddy bear-gate


  139. Teletubbies-gate


  140. Terrorist-gate


  141. Thurman-gate


  142. Titanic sinking-gate


  143. Toad-gate


  144. Travolta-gate


  145. UNEP-gate


  146. Universe-gate


  147. UN natural disasters-gate


  148. UN supernatural disasters-gate


  149. Uncut toe nails-gate


  150. Ursus-gate


  151. Venus-gate


  152. Volcano ash plume-gate


  153. Watermelon-gate


  154. What the f**k-gate


  155. Whitewater-gate


  156. Wide waist Gore-gate


  157. Will it never end-gate


  158. World-gate


  159. X-box 360 gate


  160. Yamal-gate


  161. Zebra-gate


Tuesday, 18 May 2010

Fourth International Conference on Climate Change


I'm having a wonderful time here in Chicago at the Fourth International Conference on Climate Change, organized by the Heartland Institute in order to ensure independence from warmofascist politicians. It is truly great to be here with my peers. Well, not literally peers, except for Lord Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, Curer of HIV, MS and the Common Cold, Victor of the Falklands war and Vanquisher of Al Gore. But there are plenty of real intellectual heavy-weights here: James Inhofe, Marc Morano, James Delingpole, Anthony Watts, Willis Eschenbach (Independent Climate Researcher), Ian Plimer, and the ever present S. Fred Singer! With such a collection of luminaries, the final nail in the coffin of global warming will be driven in with much force and determination!

My own presentation about the asphalt effect on Venus was received with much enthusiasm. Another favourite presentation was when Marc Morano, the bane of Kerry, had an actor dressing up as Phil Jones (nice sweater) and then demonstrated how to kick him while he was down! Then Marc produced a whip and went on to flog the poor man. Oh, how the audience cheered! It really reminded me of how we used to train the Polish laborers when I was a boy in Prussia. Sweet childhood memories. James Delingpole, one of the worlds foremost journalists who is right about everything, told a terrifying tale about the nauseating emails sent by a disgusting eco-fascist organisation to Conservative candidates asking about their positions on climate change. Such behaviors must be stopped in order to save democracy from the eco-fascists! A few of the presentations were very complicated and hard to follow though, in particular Dennings "Debunking Common Myths About Global Warming" (PPT), but the title was very good.

As usual, no bed-wetting warmists dared to turn up. They know they don't stand a chance when they cannot hide their decline behind their "peer-reviewed" and the ICCCP bureaucracy. What a pathetic bunch of cowards they are! The suckers actually have to pay to go to their own boring warmist conferences. And fortunately we were spared the assaults of the Jewish Hitler jugend.

The conference gifts are great: cigarettes, and a nice tea-party tool box! When I come home, I will throw my own tea party. I'm really looking forward to some more nice Heartland conferences this year: about the dioxin scam, the asbestos scam, the DDT scam and of course the tobacco scam!

Ubi fumus, ibi ignis.
Achtung: It has been pointed out to me that Denning's presentation was not about debunking the bedwetting warmists' myths about global warming, but the skeptical myths. Do not read it! Mr Denning is a warmista agent that has shamefully infiltrated the conference in order to spread the lies of Al Gore!

Monday, 10 May 2010

Correlation - what correlation? Part II

DenialDepot, which has been dubbed "the #1 Blog Science Blog Of the Millennium", has a must-read post which discusses my previous post "Correlation - what correlation?".
DenialDepot wisely writes:
I figure that linking to other people's posts is a good way of amplifying the noise and increasing my own post count with little work on my own part. It's also not my fault if it's wrong. I guess I could even start posting News Articles verbatim, adding just one original sentence with my interpretation of what it all means. My post count should go through the roof if I do that. Which is surely just what the World needs and will reinforce the status of this blog as the #1 Blog Science Blog Of the Millennium.

Let the echo chamber resound with the truth about the climate scum!

Natura abhorret a vacuo.

Sunday, 9 May 2010

Venus is hot!

A number of brilliant blog scientists have recently disproved the drug-induced theory that Venus is hot due to carbon dioxide. Yes, Carl Sagan was high on drugs when he came up with the theory, just like he was high during most of the recording of the TV show Cosmos (as one can notice). There are also good reasons to suspect that the artist Botticelli was high when he made his famous painting of Venus (to the left). Like those flowers floating around in the air.


Here I will propose a new and revolutionary theory about why Venus is so hot. The explanation starts at Earth. Look at the authentic photograph to the left (from the blog science blog Whats up With That). It depicts a weather station positioned in a car park covered with asphalt. It is well know that asphalt makes a place much warmer - asphalt alone can probably account for at least 65% of the alleged warming of Earth during the past century. Yet only a small portion of Earth is covered by asphalt. The situation on Venus is different: the entire planet is covered by asphalt. That is enough to increase the temperature on Venus by many hundreds of degrees Kevin! Venus is like one planet-wide car park from hell!
But what about the carbon dioxide? When asphalt (which mainly consists of carbon hydrates) gets hot, it gives away carbon dioxide. So the high temperature is the cause of the carbon dioxide, not the other way around, just like on Earth (remember the ice cores). As usual, the climate scientists have confused cause and effect.
Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur.

Saturday, 8 May 2010

Correlation - what correlation?


The graph to the left shows the global temperature according to NASA (in degrees Kevin, red line) and the CO2 measurements (parts per millions) from Manua Loa (a volcano)!

The temperature is really completely flat, while the CO2 is going up a tiny tiny bit.

This simple graph disproves two of the most egregarious lies of the IPCC cabal: (1) it is getting warmer and (2) the warming is due to CO2. There is clearly no correlation between temperature and CO2! The increase in CO2 is instead caused by the medieval warming period: as we know from the ice cores, CO2 lags 800 years behind temperature.

Using the current CO2 levels as a proxy for past temperatures, we can also conclude that it was about 100 degrees warmer 800 years ago, a period of great prosperity when they built the great cathedrals in Europe, Richard Lionheart (to the right) defeated the islamofascists, Chinese fleets sailed around the Arctic ocean and the Inca and Aztec civilizations were at their peaks. If 100 degrees Kevin was so good for humans 800 years ago, why should we worry about a couple of tens of degrees during the 21st centuries? Only the bedwetting ninnies and nincompoops of the IPCC watermelon (green outside, red inside) fruit sallad could object, because they hate humankind!
Ceterum censeo IPCCem esse delendam!

Friday, 7 May 2010

Call for Climate Inquisition

In the leftist-science journal Science, there is an open letter by 255 members of the leftist National Academy of Sciences with the title CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE INTEGRITY OF SCIENCE . What an oxymoron! These people shouldn't have signed with their own names - they should havse signed with "Dunning Kruger". I will now use my superior analytical skills to tear apart their silly letter, so chock-full of ignorance, stupidity and tyranny.


It starts with an appeal to stifle the debate about climate science - a virtual call for an inquisition against all "climate heretics":
We are deeply disturbed by the recent escalation of political assaults on scientists in general and on climate scientists in particular.

In other words: "Don't critisize us. We know best!"

Then comes this admission:
There is always some uncertainty associated with scientific conclusions; science never absolutely proves anything.

That is exactly what I have been saying all along - we don't know anything about how the climate works, and it is hubris to pretend otherwise!

Scientific conclusions derive from an understanding of basic laws supported by laboratory experiments, observations of nature, and mathematical and computer modeling.

Computer modelling has nothing to do woth reality, you morons! Do you think "World of Warcraft" is real? No, computer modelling is only fantasy!
For instance, there is compelling scientific evidence that our planet is about 4.5bn years old (the theory of the origin of Earth), that our universe was born from a single event about 14bn years ago (the Big Bang theory), and that today's organisms evolved from ones living in the past (the theory of
evolution).


Those are highly controversial hypotheses, as a quick web search reveals!
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other scientific assessments of climate change, which involve thousands of scientists producing massive ... mistakes.

This means that AGW theory is falsified beyond any doubt! But its not just massive mistakes, but also massive fraud!
But there is nothing remotely identified in the recent events that changes the fundamental conclusions about climate change:

You see: they are fundamentalists! It's there, loud and clear!
Then comes the AGW dogma, which the IPCC inquisition will use its evil powers to enforce.
(i) The planet is warming due to increased concentrations of heat-trapping gases in our atmosphere. A snowy winter in Washington does not alter this
fact.


This clearly proves that AGW theory is not falsifiable, and hence not a scientific theory according to Carl Pooper.
(ii) Most of the increase in the concentration of these gases over the last century is due to human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.

Fairytales for retarded children!
(iii) Natural causes always play a role in changing Earth's climate, but are now being overwhelmed by human-induced changes.
Rubbish!
(iv) Warming the planet will cause many other climatic patterns to change at speeds unprecedented in modern times, including increasing rates of sea-level rise and alterations in the hydrologic cycle. Rising concentrations of carbon
dioxide are making the oceans more acidic.
Sancta simplicitas, what morons!
(v) The combination of these complex climate changes threatens coastal communities and cities, our food and water supplies, marine and freshwater
ecosystems, forests, high mountain environments, and far more.

Poppycock!
And in the end, another call for an inquisition against "climate heretics".
We also call for an end to McCarthy- like threats of criminal prosecution against our colleagues based on innuendo and guilt by association, the harassment of scientists by politicians seeking distractions to avoid taking action, and the outright lies being spread about them.

It is obvious that the warmofascists do not want to have an open debate and open criminal investigations into their crimes!
I strongly suspect that at least some of the signatures are fake: Sleep, Wake, Daily, House, Goodenough!
Parturiunt montes, nascetur ridiculus mus!

Wednesday, 5 May 2010

20 definite disproofs against global warming

According to IPCC, the world is getting warmer and this is due to human emissions of carbon dioxide. Dear reader, I have to admit that also I once believed in the IPCC dogma, until I started to independently investigate the science. I soon discovered that the AGW theory (ie hypothesis) can easily be disproved by a number of indisputable scientific facts supported by thousands of scientific articles, blog entries and youtube videos which for obvious (nudge nudge) reasons didn’t make it into the IPCC propaganda reports. Learn these facts verbatim, and you will emerge victorious from every debate with the warmist scum!

  1. Temperatures have never increased – global warming stopped in 1998.
  2. We cannot accurately measure temperature. A single thermometer has an error of plus/minus several degrees Kevin, and if you use a thousand thermometers, the error is magnified to plus/minus several thousands degrees Kevin (law of large numbers).
  3. The level of carbon dioxide has not increased.
  4. We cannot measure carbon dioxide in the air with any meaningful accuracy – the atoms are transparent, and the amounts are too small (parts of billions).
  5. Carbon dioxide is an insignificant trace gas.
  6. Human emissions of carbon dioxide are dwarfed by the emissions of nature, in particular from volcanoes and fish.
  7. There is no way emissions of carbon dioxide can change the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. That level is determined by other factors, such as temperature.
  8. There is no correlations whatsoever between temperature and carbon dioxide.
  9. Correlation is not causation.
  10. There are thousands of natural factors that control the climate much more than any human activities and we know very little about these factors. The uncertainty is gargantuan!
  11. There is no proven physical theory that supports the notion that carbon dioxide can cause warming.
  12. AGW theory is based on quantum mechanics, which was disproved by Einstein: God does not play dice (alea iacta est).
  13. If carbon dioxide hypothetically would have any effect on temperature, it would have been saturated by now.
  14. The greenhouse effect violates the second law of thermodynamics.
  15. The greenhouse effect is a misnomer – there is nothing like the glass panels of a greenhouse.
  16. It was much warmer during previous historical periods when there was no carbon dioxide. For instance, it was several degrees warmer during the medieval warm period (MWP) when Greenland was green and covered by grape vines.
  17. The computer models which are the only support for the AGW hypothesis are nothing more than glorified computer games, which only do what you program them to do. Garbage in, garbage out as any programmer can testify!
  18. Computer models of the climate do not take into account clouds, water vapour, the oceans, geothermal energy, the sun and that Earth is spherical. Therefore, they are completely unrealistic.
  19. AGW theory cannot explain the medieval warming period, the little ice age, the big ice age, the Roman warming period, the Minoan warming period, the ice on the Themes and the extinction of the dinosaurs.
  20. AGW theory is not falsifiable, and hence not a scientific theory according to Popper!

Cognito ergo sum!

Ad hominem

The most common form of argument used by the warmists is the ad hominem. In this blog post, I will elucidate what ad hominem means. I have a classical education, and I enjoy very much sharing my knowledge.
Ad hominem is Latin, and literally translated it means “to advertise for carnal encounters with members of the same sex”. In the old and now sadly defunct Roman Empire, it was not uncommon for persons of a certain disposition to scribble on the wall of a gymnasium or thermis an advertisement like “You want some fun? Call for Gaius Maximus!” (but in Latin). As the knowledge of Latin has diminished over centuries, the term ad hominem has come to signify an attempt to smear and insult your opponent in a debate, instead of countering his arguments.

Ad hominem is systematically practiced by the AGW fraudsters, because what they fear most is an honest and open scientific debate. They know very well that they would have no chance to emerge victorious under such circumstances. Instead, they resort to name-calling and insults. They call us skeptics and truth-seekers “conspiracy theorists”, “bought by the oil companies” (which is weird as the oil companies can profit substantially from greenhouse gas regulations), “not proper scientists” and so on. The list could go on forever. It is truly despicable.

Incidentally, also islamofascist terrorists practice the ad hominem against their opponents in the free world. They call the US “the Great Satan” and they call those who do not adhere to their twisted faith “infidel dogs”. Warmists and islamofascist terrorists – could it really be a coincident?

Are they criminals?

Al'Gore, James Hansen, Michael Mann, Phil Jones - these are the people who have committed the greatest fraud ever on humankind! They and their henchmen in their peer-reviewed journals, their scientific associations and the humungous money-sucking IPCC.
But are these tricksters and fraudsters criminals? It might come as a surprise to you, but I would say “No!”. And I will explain why. You see, I have perfectly logical reasons for not calling them “criminals”, and as soon as you hear them you will understand what I mean. A criminal is somebody who mugs an old lady, or steals a car, or breaks into somebody’s house and leaves with the plasma TV, or sell drugs to school children. It could even be somebody who pulls a gun a shoots somebody innocent down. These are all terrible deeds, but they affect only one or a few individuals.
Let us now consider Al’Gore and his cronies. They want to throw the whole world into poverty, misery, slavery and tyranny. They want to create a new world order, where they are the supreme overlords. They are not criminals – they are super villains!
So you see, that’s why it is inappropriate to call them criminals. Al'Gore, James Hansen, Michael Mann, Phil Jones – they are super villains!

Occasio facit furem

Tuesday, 4 May 2010

Welcome to my blog, dear reader!

Welcome to my blog, dear reader! In these times of madness and hysteria, there is a need for a voice of sanity and reason. That voice is now here. On this blog, I will write the truth about all the climate scumbags who hate mankind and love animals and plants! Yes, I'm speaking about the environazis, whose latest scam after the great asbestos, DDT, ozone and dioxine scams is the carbon dioxide scam. The greatest scam of them all, by which they want to enslave humankind and turn our beautiful planet into a zoo where we the superior humans are in the cages!

Carbon dioxide is the gas of life. Plants eat it, and animals eat the plants. Then we humans eat the animals and drive around in cars so that the plants will not run out of their precious food. That is the great circle of life! But the environazis want to stop humans from emitting carbon dioxide, and that will lead to a planet-wide disaster! Not only will our economies crash and we will regress to a level were we use stone tools, live in caves and practice cannibalism! It will also derpive the plants - the flowers, grass, carrots, and the mighty redwood - of food, so they will starve, and then the animals will starve and then the humans!

This madness must be stopped, and that is the mission of this blog that you now are reading dear blog reader! This blog will be a beacon of reason, a sword of truth, a bulwark against al'Gore and his minions, a candle in the dark, a voice in the wilderness, Vox clamantis in deserto, a light at the end of the tunnel, a stake throught the vampyre's cold heart, a banderilla in the neck of the bull! Welcome to my blog! I hope you will enjoy the visit, and leave wiser than you came!

A bove maiore discit arare minor.